 |
|
Jan 10, 2008, 04:03 AM // 04:03
|
#61 |
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: somewhere over the rainbow....
Profession: A/
|
/signed just awesome idea
|
|
|
|
Jan 10, 2008, 07:32 AM // 07:32
|
#62 |
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
/Signet of Approval
Sealed Deck would be big funtime, too. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 10, 2008, 07:39 AM // 07:39
|
#63 |
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Planet Earth, Sol system, Milky Way galaxy
Guild: [ban]
Profession: W/
|
/signed
Absolutely a brilliant idea. It saddens me that Andrew Patrick has seen and passed along your previous thread without any action or announcement. Previous thread:http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...php?t=10177936 It would be nice to at least hear confirmation one way or the other if this is something they can or want to implement, or if this will take too much time from GW2 for them to pursue. edit: Perhaps no news is good news? Their response might be to go live with this in a future update. Last edited by MisterB; Jan 10, 2008 at 07:47 AM // 07:47.. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 10, 2008, 10:21 AM // 10:21
|
#64 |
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Isle of the dead
Guild: [DVDF][LDS]
Profession: P/W
|
good stuff
/signed |
|
|
|
|
Jan 10, 2008, 10:39 AM // 10:39
|
#65 |
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In my chair
Guild: Wooting The Woot For The Woot
|
/signed
Its a nice idea probluly you mean playing against npc's/ real players but a-net also need to imrpove the ai |
|
|
|
|
Jan 10, 2008, 10:58 AM // 10:58
|
#66 |
|
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tripping in Holland
Guild: My guild died :`(
Profession: N/
|
/dig
I like all the ideas mentioned in the OP /signed also kuddos on the photoshopping, the screens look pretty good. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 10, 2008, 11:14 AM // 11:14
|
#67 |
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Dec 2006
Profession: D/
|
It's pretty funny how you're fix to PvP is mainly based on 1v1..
But nonetheless, the ideas are good. /signed |
|
|
|
|
Jan 10, 2008, 11:07 PM // 23:07
|
#68 |
|
Academy Page
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft. Worth TX
Guild: House of Soot?!
Profession: Mo/W
|
i dont like all the ideas in this thread, but it is a step in the right direction.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 11, 2008, 12:58 AM // 00:58
|
#69 |
|
Grotto Attendant
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada
|
/signed
(Actually I might have signed before, don't know if this is the same thread or a different one, but just in case it is a different thread.) This is an excellent idea, particularly the permanent visitors. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 11, 2008, 01:41 AM // 01:41
|
#70 | |
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Jun 2005
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 11, 2008, 04:39 AM // 04:39
|
#71 | |
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles, California
Guild: Picnic Pioneers
Profession: E/
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 11, 2008, 06:43 AM // 06:43
|
#72 |
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Planet Earth, Sol system, Milky Way galaxy
Guild: [ban]
Profession: W/
|
1v1 was just one of the options listed in the OP; it's not the focus of this thrread, at all. Rather, I see this as constructive suggestions to increase the available number of playtypes of PvP using assets already in-game. Also, it'd be real nice to be able to do more in Guild Halls in a game called Guild Wars. Yay for stickie!
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 11, 2008, 07:14 AM // 07:14
|
#73 |
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Guild: retired from gw [agro] still ftw
Profession: W/
|
/kudos...
Like your thread and the whole idea of it.. Good arguments and beautiful layout... should be picked up by anet imho |
|
|
|
|
Jan 11, 2008, 04:56 PM // 16:56
|
#74 |
|
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Sep 2006
Guild: Warrior Nation[WN]
|
/signed
Alot of my guildies like to 1vs1 and the current options just plain fail. I like these ideas because people would have the option to PvP for FUN rather than for PvP glory or w/e. I can guarantee you that more people would actually log on just to do this. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 11, 2008, 10:01 PM // 22:01
|
#75 |
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Jun 2007
Profession: E/
|
/signed
But i think that a-net won't make anything with this |
|
|
|
|
Jan 13, 2008, 09:43 AM // 09:43
|
#76 |
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Yea thats a sweet idea =]
may i suggest one improvement tho? This really shouldn't require a guild hall, since any1 wanting to do this kind of PvP would have to be high ranked in a guild with a guild hall. I think there prolly should be another island on the isles where you could do this sort of thing. Essentially a glorified lobby =P, where you can create the games and join etc. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 13, 2008, 10:11 AM // 10:11
|
#77 |
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Finland
Guild: [Dys]
Profession: Mo/
|
/Signed :>
/Signed
One of the best ideas in a very long time. I surely do hope, that this will happen. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 13, 2008, 10:44 AM // 10:44
|
#78 |
|
Emo Goth Italics
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
/signed
What Orin said! |
|
|
|
|
Jan 13, 2008, 11:13 AM // 11:13
|
#79 |
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Adelaide, Australia
|
/signed
I wasn't expecting this when I clicked on the sticky I don't really know what to say but I can say that this is something that GW truly needs and it would be great to see it happen. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 13, 2008, 11:53 AM // 11:53
|
#80 |
|
Pre-Searing Cadet
Join Date: Jan 2007
Guild: DVDF - Blu Ray
Profession: Mo/
|
Wouldn't it be easier if Anet just said that we could guest people for free?
The other thing I would like is the facility to invite more than 20 people as guests (for parties, and team events) and also for guilds to do this if they have more than 80 members. The current system allows for 20 guests. But if your guild has say 90 members, you are only allowed 10 invites. |
|
|
|
 |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:14 PM // 12:14.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("